Intermittent Diagnostic Techniques
INTERMITTENT DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUESIntermittent diagnostic techniques help find and isolate the root cause of intermittent concerns associated with the electronic engine control (EEC) system. The information is organized to help find the concern and carry out the repair. The process of finding and isolating an intermittent concern starts with recreating a fault symptom, accumulating PCM data, and comparing that data to typical values, then analyzing the results. Refer to the scan tool manufacturer's instruction manual for the functions described below.
Before proceeding, be sure that:
- Customary mechanical system tests and inspections do not reveal a concern.
NOTE:
- Mechanical component conditions can make a PCM system react abnormally
- Service bulletins, if available, are reviewed.
- Quick Test and associated diagnostic subroutines have been completed without finding a concern, and the symptom is still present.
Re-creating the Fault
Recreating the concern is the first step in isolating the cause of the intermittent symptom. A thorough investigation should start with the customer information worksheet located in the back of this manual. If freeze frame data is available, it may help in recreating the conditions at the time of a malfunction indicator lamp diagnostic trouble code (MIL DTC). Listed below are some of the conditions for recreating the concern:
Conditions To Recreate Fault:
Accumulating PCM Data
PCM data can be accumulated in a number of ways. This includes circuit measurements with a multimeter or IDS or equivalent tester PID data. Acquisition of PCM PID data using the IDS or equivalent tester is one of the easiest ways to gather information. Gather as much data as possible when the fault is occurring to prevent improper diagnosis. Data should be accumulated during different operating conditions and based on the customer description of the intermittent fault. Compare this data with the known good data values located in PID/DATA Monitor Reference.
This will require recording data in four conditions for comparison: 1) KOEO, 2) HOT IDLE, 3) 48 km/h (30 mph) and 4) 89 km/ h (55 mph).
Comparing PCM Data
This typically requires the comparison of the actual values from the vehicle to the typical values from the PID/DATA Monitor. The charts apply to different vehicle applications (engine and transmission).
Analyzing PCM Data
Look for abnormal events or values that are clearly incorrect. Inspect the signals for abrupt or unexpected changes. For example, during a steady cruise most of the sensor values should be relatively stable. Sensors such as throttle position (TP), mass air flow (MAF), and RPM that change abruptly when the vehicle is traveling at a constant speed are clues to a possible concern area.
Look for agreement in related signals. For example, if TP changes during acceleration, corresponding changes should occur in idle air control (IAC), RPM, and SPARK ADV PID.
Make sure the signals act in correct sequence. An increase in RPM after the TP is increased is expected. However, if RPM increases without a TP change, then a fault may exist.
PID Example
Scroll through the PID data while analyzing the information. Look for sudden drops or spikes in the values. (Refer to the following TP1 example). Notice the major jump in the TP1 voltage while scrolling through the information. This example would require a smooth and progressive accelerator pedal travel during a key on and engine off mode.